On 04/03/12 11:01, Michael Scherer wrote:
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458974
( notably the comment from #10 ). I would push this to non-free, because
that would be a problem for a company.
OK - Is that: "--define section=non-free/release" (I never used that
before)
What about the license field in the spec? I suspect that the BS will
reject anything that issues an rpmlint warning - and everything I have
tried so far does. e.g. "LGPL-like"
I am also somewhat confused by the modular approach used by Debian to
package this. It seems over-complicated, but I may be missing the point.
I opted for a single library, -devel and main.
Any thoughts on this?
The object is to provide needed Requires/BuildRequires for FreeCAD which
I am also working on.
Barry
