2012/3/8 Colin Guthrie <[email protected]>: > 'Twas brillig, and Juan Luis Baptiste at 07/03/12 23:45 did gyre and gimble: >> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Colin Guthrie <[email protected]> wrote: >>> As I said last time to this question, I'd certainly be extremely annoyed >>> if mga2 does not default to systemd. I've given up a massive amount of >>> my free time over this cycle working towards this. I would be massively >>> annoyed if this effort was ultimately towards a secondary option. >>> >>> >> >> Don't worry, no one has said that it shouldn't :), but it's clear >> there's a confusion as you have seen, many people understood that >> systemd would come as an alternative to mga2 and sysvinit as default, >> and systemd as default in mga3. I also remember reading last year this >> but never the change of plans, maybe it was decided on the meetinfgs, >> but as I can't attend to them because of the schedule I missed the >> announcement. > > Well that's just the thing, I don't see it as a change... As far as I'm > concerned I've always been targeting a systemd-by-default mga2.
I thought as well that this will be the case. Related question: Just started updates and urpmi asks me to select either - systemd-sysvinit or - sysvinit-legacy for installation. I suppose when using systemd I should install systemd-sysvinit, right? -- wobo
