On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 09:24, Thierry Vignaud <[email protected]> wrote: > On 18 March 2012 00:42, <[email protected]> wrote: >> Revision 3550 Author pterjan Date 2012-03-18 00:42:31 +0100 (Sun, 18 Mar >> 2012) >> >> Log Message >> >> Kill unionfs support > > Why? > It was a nice speedup when used. > It was disabled only b/c of a kernel oops long ago > which should be OK now
Well unionfs seemed to get different oops in each new version. Anyway I don't think it should be done like this (having specific code for unionfs everywhere). I want to improve current chroot mode (like using a cgroup to easily kill all processes or set limits) and have a common api to allow other modes, like building in kvm for example, or using lvm/btrfs rw snapshots (which should be better supported than unionfs).
