'Twas brillig, and Thomas Spuhler at 24/03/12 22:49 did gyre and gimble: > On Saturday, March 24, 2012 12:36:06 PM Sander Lepik wrote: >> On Mar 24, 2012 9:13 PM, "Thomas Spuhler" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> please push clamav-0.97.4 >>> -- >>> Best regards >>> Thomas Spuhler >> >> Why? >> >> -- >> Sander > it's an upgrade from 0.97.4 > We need to provide the newest version of the antivirus package
This, by itself, is not a very good explanation. If this is purely a definitions update then that's fine. If this is a bugfix update that's probably fine too (depending on the bug) If it's a new feature update then that likely won't make it. People are all very busy. It only takes the person requesting the push a minute or two to describe things properly. Please give your busy colleagues the respect they deserve and provide good explanations to save them having to spend time discussing and asking further questions. We still don't really have enough information to decide on this one! So please state whether it's just definitions or bugfix (and if so what bugs) etc. Col -- Colin Guthrie colin(at)mageia.org http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/ Open Source: Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/ PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/ Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/
