On Wed, 23 May 2012 14:38:09 -0400, Colin Guthrie <[email protected]> wrote:
NAK. No it's not redundant it's very important. The symlinks *will* be broken when run via the installer due to the $::prefix as they will point to "non-existent" paths in /lib/systemd/ (not to /mnt/lib/systemd...) so I treat any symlink that exists (even if it points to an invalid unit) as "valid" here.
Wouldn't it have been better to use relative symlinks then? Regards, Dave Hodgins
