2012/6/3 AL13N <[email protected]>: > Op zondag 3 juni 2012 14:04:07 schreef Wolfgang Bornath: >> 2012/6/3 Jani Välimaa <[email protected]>: >> > On 03.06.2012 14:35, Richard Couture wrote: >> >> I am a bit confused by your message... I sent my message with a new and >> >> unique Subject, How is that considered hijacking a thread? Am I missing >> >> the point? >> > >> > New and unique subject isn't always enough. There's still some headers >> > from message which you presumably used with Reply button to get mailing >> > list address and then erased the message box. >> > >> > To: Mageia development mailing-list <[email protected]> >> > References: <[email protected]> >> > In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> >> >> Well, normally I do not look at the extended header. In my mailer the >> message by Richard came in as new message, not within an older thread. >> That's why I also replied that I do not see any hijacked Thread. >> >> Looking at the references show 2 references but i never received the >> mails with these references. > [...] > > it's Anne's mail with subject: [Mageia-dev] Mageia 2 and Cauldron updated with > proper design
Ok, I received that. Conclusion: My mail client (Googlemail online) does not honor references, splits threads by subject only. New experience. -- wobo
