Sander Lepik wrote: > 09.06.2012 10:06, blind Pete kirjutas: >> andre999 wrote: >> >> [snip] >>> I see your point. >>> In most cases, a backport for mga1 would be essentially identical for >>> mga2 (except package file name and corresponding changes in the spec >>> file). It would only differ if dependancies differ, which I suspect is >>> unlikely for wesnoth or most other games, for example. >>> So this means that for a backport to mga1, we should first do one to >>> mga2. >> [snip] >> >> No. Cauldron then mga2 then mga1. >> > Well, you can't do backport for mga2 if you don't have new version in > cauldron ;)
Just trying to be complete. This is the sort of situation where incompleteness becomes ambiguity which becomes a bug. -- blind Pete Sig goes here...
