20.06.2012 14:45, Simple w kirjutas: > 2012/6/20 Oliver Burger <[email protected]>: >> Am 20.06.2012 12:45, schrieb Simple w: >> >>> about faac was already discussed, but i dont understand why amrwb >>> wasnt packaged so that apps can be build against it, it exists in svn, >>> could anyone please clarify? >>> >>> I see that amrwd doesnt have the same problems that faac has, so it >>> could easily go to the non-free repository since its under a >>> commercial license. >> According to wikipedia it's patented as well. So it's the same issue. > Appears to be different from faac case, because this one doesnt have a > GPL license, so it could be in non-free repository. How does it differ if it's patented?
-- Sander
