On Jun 21, 2012 9:10 PM, "AL13N" <[email protected]> > > so, there's 2 options: > > - testing i586 with backports enabled > - testing x86_64 without backports enabled > > this is still 2 tests, and this is sufficient. Are you serious? I've seen bugs were i586 and x86_64 doesn't work quite the same. Every arch + repo must be tested separately (be it tainted or release, i'm still not mixing backports with updates ... until you promise to do all the testing here and not bother QA;)). -- Sander
- Re: [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revis... AL13N
- Re: [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revis... Thomas Backlund
- Re: [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revis... Claire Robinson
- Re: [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option shou... AL13N
- Re: [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option shou... Claire Robinson
- Re: [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option... AL13N
- Re: [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update op... Claire Robinson
- Re: [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update op... Sander Lepik
- Re: [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --updat... AL13N
- Re: [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --u... zezinho
- Re: [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited... David W. Hodgins
- Re: [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revis... Sander Lepik
- Re: [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --u... Sander Lepik
- Re: [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited... AL13N
- Re: [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revis... Sander Lepik
- Re: [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revis... AL13N
- Re: [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --u... Claire Robinson
