On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Colin Guthrie <[email protected]> wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and D.Morgan at 23/06/12 10:10 did gyre and gimble: >> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 8:03 AM, AL13N <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Op zaterdag 23 juni 2012 07:53:40 schreef AL13N: >>>> Op zaterdag 23 juni 2012 01:00:03 schreef D.Morgan: >>>>> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 12:42 AM, AL13N <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> I was planning on doing 5.5.25 as an update since all post-GA releases >>>>>> are >>>>>> bugfix release in the same major version. >>>>>> >>>>>> however, mariadb has been having rpm build issues and as such one of the >>>>>> last changes seemed to introduce a few things: >>>>>> >>>>>> - 2 man pages missing (i reverted this for us) >>>>>> - 1 config file missing. (i reverted this for us) >>>>>> - private header files are installed (i removed this from our package) >>>>>> - selinux configuration for RHEL4 now appears (i also removed this) >>>>>> - handlersocket plugin is now installed. (i put this in the -extra >>>>>> subpackage) >>>>>> >>>>>> This looks obviously a feature, except that i didn't it was stable for >>>>>> 5.5.23 and was simply forgotten to be installed, and is thus categorized >>>>>> as a bugfix. >>>>>> >>>>>> Next to these are quite the amount of bugfixes. (none security related >>>>>> afaik). >>>>>> >>>>>> Is this acceptable for updates? or isn't it? >>>>> >>>>> why do you ask *after* commiting on the svn ? would be better to ask >>>>> "before" >>>> >>>> huh? i didn't commit yet? or at least i didn't think i had? >>> >>> ah wait, i did a "mgarepo sync -d" . are you referring to that? >>> >>> i did almost accidentally commit, but it told me that the commit had failed >>> (due to my CTRL+C) >>> >>> but checking my svn workspace, the spec file and the extra patch isn't >>> committed though >> >> http://svnweb.mageia.org/packages/updates/2/mariadb/current/ >> >> commited 10 hours ago >> >> >> Version: 5.5.25 >> >> so spec file have been commited. > > Yeah I've often found that with SVN commits where I realise a mistake > has been made, my CTRL-C never seems to be quick enough! > > Col
btw to go back to the subject, i am not "against" as there is no change in the major, so no rebuild needed. Do you have a list of the changes of this release ?
