> On 27 June 2012 12:38, Maarten Vanraes <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> can we have another talk of bug 2317? to find people willing to make a >>>> new patch that's quite more complex? >>>> >>>> ideally bug 2317 should be fixed before backports opens >>> >>> No, it's not related since you can't garanty that every user will get >>> the >>> update prior to use backports. >>> So there's no need to rush... >> >> QA team told me that it would increase their workload dramatically, so i >> think there is need rush. > > Again, there's no rush to change mgaapplet as anyway, not all users > will use it. > We cannot break those systems... > We have to continue supporting those. > > Once a release is released, we've to support it. > It's done. >
i was under the impression that we would be fixing this for both mgaapplet and urpmi --update (by changing perl-urpm; like my patch does) and that we would submit these as updates, so the QA workload goes down immediately.
