David Walser <luigiwalser@...> writes: > This is a documentation package, not a library package, so it shouldn't be using a mklibname name in the > name, right? This causes a package > by the following name to appear on the *i586* mirrors: > lib64boost-devel-doc
Ping? This is incorrect, is it not? Can we fix this? It's not obvious to me how to do it, as renaming it back and trying to obsolete the current name wouldn't even work because of this.
