-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 24/07/12 15:09, Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Anne Wilson at 24/07/12 14:42 did gyre and > gimble: >> On 24/07/12 10:20, Colin Guthrie wrote: >>> 'Twas brillig, and Anne Wilson at 24/07/12 09:42 did gyre and >>> gimble: >>>> 46 packages are reported as being orphans after the move, but >>>> many of those are libraries and video drivers, of which the >>>> intel one is, I think, the one I use. OTOH, >>>> /usr/sbin/remove-unused-packages finds only a wacom driver >>>> to be removed. >>>> >>>> Advice? >> >>> No idea. The move shouldn't have affected this list at all. >> >>> /me doesn't use this feature anyway. I always use "urpmq >>> --not-available" to remove old packages as I find the built in >>> orphan tracking to not really be all that useful for me. >> >> That gives an even longer list, including harddrake and >> drakxtools. I doubt if leaving them is going to cause any >> problems, so I'm going to ignore them. > > --not-available should never show e.g. drakxtools or similar > unless your system is not fully up-to-date. > > It basically compares your installed versions with the latest > version available via your media. > > Typically it would list old libraries we no longer ship (e.g. > libudev0 for example) and which you can now safely remove. > I hadn't done today's update at that point. I have now, and the drak* packages are no longer listed. I confess I haven't been diligent in cleaning out orphans in the past, so they could have been there some time. Most of the listed packages seem to be libboost_* - are these old ones? If there's any doubt I'll just leave things.
Anne - -- Need KDE help? Try http://userbase.kde.org or http://forum.kde.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlAOx3kACgkQj93fyh4cnBeOcACfQmnskZJEca+6DNl0mqzg+a9U ABsAn1hsibYvF4dUraWM37yUBKlre/cL =7axB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
