27.07.2012 15:27, Damien Lallement kirjoitti:
Le 27/07/2012 13:52, Anssi Hannula a écrit :
25.06.2012 20:48, [email protected] kirjoitti:
Revision
263611
Author
dams
Date
2012-06-25 19:48:03 +0200 (Mon, 25 Jun 2012)
Log Message
new version 1.5.7
[...]
Modified: cauldron/wine/current/SPECS/wine.spec
===================================================================
--- cauldron/wine/current/SPECS/wine.spec 2012-06-25 17:42:45 UTC
(rev 263610)
+++ cauldron/wine/current/SPECS/wine.spec 2012-06-25 17:48:03 UTC
(rev 263611)
@@ -19,10 +19,10 @@
# When altering this, make sure the new wine-gecko is submitted or
at least
# notify its maintainer of the needed update.
-%define gecko_version 1.5
+%define gecko_version 1.6
Please read the above comment.
Our wine-gecko is 1.4 and I haven't gotten any notification. So just
remember it next time :)
[dams@maximus wine]$ rpmbuild -ba SPECS/wine.spec
+ [...]
+ /bin/cat /home/dams/RPM/SOURCES/wine-mgaconf.patch
+ /usr/bin/patch -s -p1 -b --suffix .conf --fuzz=0
++ sed -rn 's,^#define\s+GECKO_VERSION\s+"([^"]*)".*$,\1,p'
dlls/appwiz.cpl/addons.c
+ GECKO_VERSION=1.6
+ '[' 1.6 = 1.4 ']'
+ echo wine-gecko version mismatch
wine-gecko version mismatch
+ exit 1
erreur :
So... That's why I updated this %define in the time when pushing new
release of wine... :-/
I didn't say you shouldn't have updated the define, but you should've
followed what the comment says. I.e. "When altering this, notify
wine-gecko maintainer or update wine-gecko yourself". If the comment
isn't clear enough, feel free to make it clearer (I'm not sure how).
--
Anssi Hannula
