On 27 July 2012 18:56, Thierry Vignaud <[email protected]> wrote: >> speaking of that btw... anything missing for that, or should we plan & >> start the full rebuild... ? > > Please wait. > Here's what I have yet to commit/upload:
Just done > Version 1.152 - 27 Jul 2012, by Thierry Vignaud > - add support for mini debug packages > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo) > - fix typo that breaks emiting maven provides > - document Mageia divergences with upstream > - generate a perlapi-<version> provide when libperl.so is found > (inspirated from mdv (pok)) > - sync brp-compress with upstream rpm.org: > o add *.xz and *.lzma recompress support > o avoid some unnecessary command invocations in scripts > o make sure brp-compress doesn't go interactive in corner cases > - sync find-debuginfo.sh with upstream rpm.org: > o add -r flag to find-debuginfo.sh to invoke eu-strip --reloc-debug-sections > (Mark Wielaard, 2011-05-25) > o create GDB index from find-debuginfo if possible (Tom Tromey, > RhBug:617166) > o drop useless rpm5 bits (less divergence with upstream) > o generate debug symlinks for all filenames sharing a build-id > (RhBug:641377) > o fix behavior on cross-directory hardlinks (RhBug:618426) > - kill unused find-provides.perl.in > - prevent RPM_BUILD_ROOT to break brp-* scripts if it contains spaces > (rpm.org#843) > - use upstream brp-strip* as we provided older versions of upstream > > The question is: should we enable minidebuginfo by default? > This adds 1-3% to each package but it makes us have usefufull traces by > default > (at least with function names) > Not as good as having debug packages installed by default, but still better. > This is enabled in FC18. > > Do we enable this? See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo
