Thierry Vignaud skrev 5.8.2012 22:48:
On 5 August 2012 21:44, fwang <[email protected]> wrote:
fwang <fwang> 2.16-2.mga3:
+ Revision: 278906
- rebuild for updated zh_CN definition
Which helps raise the question: is it still pertinent to have a
separate locales SRPM?
WDYT Cauldron people?
Actually changes like this was the reason for separate locales,
by doing locale changes/updates only in locales package
without the need for rebuilding glibc...
And the other way, no need to rebuild locales everytime
glibc is patched...
I see this was a change done in both packages, but it might
have been doable in locales only at buildtime...
--
Thomas