Le 08/09/12 13:39,Thierry Vignaud nous adresse ces quelques mots : >> Hi Malo, >> >> I am in agreement with your proposal above, but I think the RPM groups >> policy need a wider overhaul. For examples, I miss categories for scheduling >> and productivity, as well as a category for personal finances, etc. >> >> As these changes also mean an update to our rpmlint package, I think it is >> best if someone drafts up a list of the needed changes and presents that in >> an upcoming dev team meeting for sanctioning. > > Yes it may be better. > _Then_, we'll need to update > http://svnweb.mageia.org/soft/rpmdrake/trunk/Rpmdrake/icon.pm?view=markup
True. I can draft the change proposal. Please send me your suggestions for improvement. As a reference point, maybe people can have a look at the two extremes: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RPMGroups (29 groups) http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Package_group_guidelines (A lot more, 20 just for games) So far I have suggestions for: - Creating: * Development/OCaml * Development/Tools * Games/First Person Shooters (or simply Games/Shoot) * some category for scheduling, productivity (?) and personal finance: maybe we can create subcategories of Office? (the following are inspired from Suse) * Office/Dictionary * Office/Finance * Office/Management * Office/Organizers * Office/Other * Office/Spreadsheets * Office/Suite * Office/Word Processor * Security (for all security related tools: encryption, signature, forensics, etc): they are currently spread around file - Removing: * Books/Faqs (not used by any package) As Thierry mentions, these changes mostly affect rpmdrake, where icons and possibly translations would need to be adapted. I will coordinate these changes needed to rpmdrake once we agree on the group list. Any other suggestions for the groups? Cheers, -- Malo
