On Sun, 2012-09-30 at 20:13 +0200, Angelo Naselli wrote: > Well to be honest that has been already discussed via irc, > and it seems to be as you said a good thing, the real > question is how to call it :)
The usual choices are 1. an acronym few people will remember e.g. miascm (multi-interface system control module) 2. a cute name with no relation to function e.g. WandWaver 3. a name that suggests purpose, perhaps with an abbreviation for the commandline e.g. Configuration and User Management and, er, "conman" as a command (not cum, I think). I can review the Perl code a little if it helps - my goal with Perl is always to write something that can be read and changed later, even if it's less "Perl-like" as a result. E.g. send me a file or two. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml Co-author: 5th edition of "Beginning XML", Wrox, July 2012
