Wolfgang Bornath <[email protected]> writes: > There has been a wide consensus for the solution to put it into > tainted as has been said in this thread as well.
The consensus was maybe not so clear then. > Sorry if it is too offending for one or the other if I call this > procedure "ridiculous". Where do you see a procedure here? :-) Offer one if you think that's needed. It could be up to the council or board to chose the lesser evil between: - picking tainted for non-free + tainted packages like faac, and thus forbid mirroring tainted packages that are only free-software (but maybe that's the hypothetical 'selective mirror admin' from Guillaume) - adding a new nonfree-tainted repository, just for faac for now, despite the relative media clutter that it would add, but for the sake of clear definitions of the media content -- Olivier Blin - blino
