On Monday 29 October 2012 23:20, Olivier Blin wrote: > I would prefer B: adding a nonfree-tainted repo (+ its > updates/testing/backports/debug brothers).
> Yes, that's overkill, it will clutter the urpmi media config UI, but > that's the only clean way we have. And it's a way that satisfy most, if not all users. Including me. My only issue here is that we shouldn't start having nonfree software in the same repo as Free software. If that means having two non-free repo's where one is tainted, then so be it. It's more important to do things right, than to compromize on our long standing values and murk the waters. -- Johnny A. Solbu PGP key ID: 0xFA687324
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
