Jehan Pagès a écrit : > Ok I understood the deal. > I would personally prefer even a longer package name like > jack-audio-connection-kit. Mageia would gain from having clearer naming. > Especially if we add the Jack1 alternative. > > Now if this is a big deal, and it generates a controversy again, it is > not that a big deal. The question thus is: how do I call Jack1 package > then? And can I say that this new package "Provides: jackit" so that it > works as an alternative to Jack2 (for instance for Ardour)? > Thanks. > > Jehan I think you may ask jackit maintainer : dexter morgan and Ardour maintainer (it was shikamaru... don't know now !)
Regards Philippe
