Florent Monnier skrev 28.11.2012 20:39:
2012/11/28, Thierry Vignaud <[email protected]>:
On 28 November 2012 15:44, blue_prawn <[email protected]>
wrote:
blue_prawn <blue_prawn> 0.3-5.mga3:
+ Revision: 322631
- no change, only a rebuild
Please tell why you rebuild
eg: "rebuild for new ocaml" or whatever instead of "no change..."
malo (other ocaml packager) suggests me to put "rebuild for Beta 1"
but this is the goal, not the origine,
the reason is because a dependency was rebuild.
in ocaml if a dependency is rebuild, all the dependents and
sub-dependents have to be rebuild.
So which log message would you prefer:
- rebuild for Beta 1
this one:
- rebuild because dependency rebuilt
as it's the real reason.
or more like:
- rebuild for new ocaml
(or wichever package "triggered" the need for rebuild)
--
Thomas
