David Walser skrev 2.12.2012 19:30:
Thomas Backlund wrote:
Thomas Backlund skrev 1.12.2012 18:09:
Hi,
as shown with the recent pcre case, we need to be more verbose on
the -dev ml about packages that are WIP and/or known to break bs...
I'm in the process of updating ppl from 0.11.2 to 1.0
(and cloog-ppl to whatever matching version is)
Now, if this package hits the buildsystem & mirrors before it's
properly tested it _will_ break atleast gcc, so all builds will
come to a full stop in cauldron.
So whatever you do... _dont_ touch theese packages until I have
tested and submitted them.
You can forget about this update ...
I forgot to check what gcc actually supports :/
Thanks for looking into this.
gcc-4.7 requires ppl-0.11 branch and cloog-ppl-0.15 branch
Are you sure about cloog-ppl? Current mdv/ROSA has cloog-ppl 0.16.1 with gcc
4.7.3-development. Actually ROSA 2012 LTS has gcc 4.6.1 with
cloog-ppl 0.16.1.
I guess they package CLooG 0.16 as cloog-ppl.
But I dont think I want to switch to that as it's still considered
being in testing stage...
From GCC-4.7 prerequisites.html:
CLooG-PPL version 0.15 or CLooG 0.16:
Necessary to build GCC with the Graphite loop optimizations. There
are two versions available. CLooG-PPL 0.15 as well as CLooG 0.16.
The former is the default right now. It can be downloaded from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ as cloog-ppl-0.15.tar.gz.
CLooG 0.16 support is still in testing stage, but will be the
default in future GCC releases. It is also available at
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ as cloog-0.16.1.tar.gz.
--
Thomas