Guillaume Rousse <guillomovitch@...> writes: > Also, recurrent argument as 'we should obsoletes X so as to remove it > from mirror' is still a non-sense. Removing content on the mirror is an > internal administrative issue.
Yes, I still agree with you on this in general. > The whole issue should rather be documented in release notes, so as to > have admins handle the upgrade explicitely, rather than trying to > adresse it automagically. OK, that sounds reasonable then. Thanks.
