What about Debian or ArchLinux organisation scheme with users interaction? We can digg those to find a way of organisation. In my opinion, two should be three parts of a decision maker group. Call it assembly or whatever you want. First, members from Mageia developers (coders, packagers, web site and wiki developers etc.), members from local users communities. I don't know who are the advocates as mentioned in announcement. If Mageia will be a community driven project and not a company product there must be community members in board. I think %50-%50 developer-community ratio is fine. Local communities should elect their representive by themselves. We can elect our representive for 2 years. Thats how i think the decision maker board should formed in.
OFFTOPİC: Mageia name is a bit weird for Turkish users. We even can't pronounce them like European language speakers. If someone asked me the distro name i'd rather prefer Magic Wand Linux... _______________________________________________ Mageia-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss
