On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:16, Romain d'Alverny <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > I completely agree, communities are great, but i think these stuff should > be > > advisable only, and we should get board members who can decide on these > > things, because they are knowledgable in their own area. > > > > I don't think the community should be disregarded by the board, but > sometimes > > the board should decide differently by the community because the > community > > doesn't know everything. > > Then it should know. > > I know this may sound like an innocent wish, but I mean it. > > The "board" will have to motivate every decision/move it takes - > especially if this very decision was to go against most > recommandations/wishes from the community (he, who knows, it may > happen). > > We expect Mageia, not to disclose, but to publish all information, > data, metrics about the project, developement, tasks, maybe about > product usage and about decisions. Or at least, not to keep them > hidden on purpose. > > That will require to identify what useful metrics are and to > understand them for what they're worth (and not). That will require > some education on what metrics we can collect (think about privacy and > right here), how we collect them, how we use and learn from these. > > Not that it will be easy or without mistake at first. But that's what > we expect as well. > > Romain > > Great. I am interested in new technical means by which heterogeneous (in background and knowledge) groups can meaninfully communicate. In general, but Mageia seems to me to be in a good position to innovate in that direction. -- Frederic
_______________________________________________ Mageia-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss
