Le lundi 4 octobre 2010 09:42:02, Maât a écrit : > Le 04/10/2010 09:26, Frédéric CUIF a écrit : > > Le dimanche 3 octobre 2010 22:40:45, Olivier Méjean a écrit : > > > >> So, even if there is a good tool to have a bidirectional Gateway between > >> ML > >> and web forum i don't think we will meet efficiency with it. The best way > >> for me > >> is to have these different tools since they have different audiences, some > >> of us > >> will be on both tools but most will use just one. > >> > > I think we MUST have a good tool to do so, because it's probably the only > > way to allow end users to speak with developpers, ech category of people > > with its favorite tool. We cannot act the same way as Mandriva was doing, > > setting up two different tools, because it promotes the > > compartmentalization of the groups of users. If we want a distribution set > > for developpers AND en users, they must talk together. > > > > You can not force people to communicate without their assent :)
Yes, I know that my sentence sounds irrealistic or like a fairy tale... But I think we should discuss about what could change in our behaviours. Why couldn' we think about adapting the way of treating information ? That's juste what i'm saying, and you might have noticed that I'm not working in computers ;) Please, take into account that's only y point of view, and that my bad english makes me write my sentences not exactly as I would like to explain them :)
