On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 18:37, Tux99 <[email protected]> wrote: > If that's how it is intended, then that's fine by me, my concern was > primarily that the structures described might hinder occasional > spontaneous additional volunteer work in other teams/tasks than the > one, that someone enrolled in, without having to first enroll in other > teams.
We don't want to hinder spontaneous contributions, but still, there is a balance to find to control/guide what goes in and how. Hence some structure to validate and committed mastering/mentoring roles in teams. That does not prevent listening, collecting and taking into account feedback, contributions, opinions from everyone. But those who commit to a given team work and processes get to organize and ponder all this to fit in the whole project. Romain
