On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Enrico Gsell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > ---------------------------------------- >> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:57:35 -0600 >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Mageia-discuss] Logo proposals discussion >> >> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Thorsten van Lil wrote: >> >>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>>> Von: [email protected] [mailto:mageia- >>>> [email protected]] Im Auftrag von Wayne Sallee >>>> Gesendet: Freitag, 19. November 2010 13:24 >>>> An: Mageia general discussions >>>> Betreff: Re: [Mageia-discuss] Logo proposals discussion >>>> >>>> Pascal Terjan wrote on 11/19/2010 06:53 AM: >>>>> followed by >>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/54240...@n08/5017306285/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yea, I think that one looks nice too. >>>> >>>> Wayne Sallee >>>> [email protected] >>> >>> But stars arn't allowed I thought and as mentioned in the >>> guidelines. >> >> I don't think they're actually barred. I think a number of people just >> thought it wouldn't be a good idea if we want >> to differentiate ourselves from Mandriva, which I think we do. That's why I >> wouldn't vote for that one. >> >>> My favorites are: >>> 1. http://www.flickr.com/photos/ofaurax/5127775007/ >>> 2. http://www.flickr.com/photos/ueros/5099707080/ >>> 3. http://www.flickr.com/photos/54167...@n08/5038318001/ >>> 4. http://www.flickr.com/photos/tigger-gg/5027064477/ >> >> I don't like the other three but I like no. 3. It would look even better, in >> my opinion, if the encircling ribbon >> was less visually overpowering, framing rather than dominating the central >> sphere. Also, and this is true of many >> of the submissions, the lettering tries too hard to be original at the >> expense of legibility and attractiveness. >> Any number of more or less standard fonts would be better. (I like >> Cheltenham myself.) It's the logo itself that >> needs to stand out and be distinctive. "Mageia" isn't the logo. >> >> Dale Huckeby > > > For number 3 i agree with the logo, but i absolutely don't like the font. > Those are my favorites: > http://www.flickr.com/photos/ofaurax/5127775007/in/pool-mageia-artSimple but > still modern. > http://www.flickr.com/photos/54316...@n06/5141934927/in/pool-mageia-artI like > that mix of different symbols, shows the variety of the distribution. > http://www.flickr.com/photos/54167...@n08/5038318001/in/pool-mageia-artGreat > modern looking logo, but still i am not really happy with the font. > http://www.flickr.com/photos/54240...@n08/5013673327/in/pool-mageia-artJust > somehow like it ;) > Kind regards,Enrico > > > >
>> For number 3 i agree with the logo, but i absolutely don't like the font. I like that as well, but don't like the color. It looks too passive.; not exciting -- Hoyt
