2010/12/8 Hoyt Duff <[email protected]>: > > Since there were published guidelines and the guidelines were > important and a community effort will attract many skilled people who > are not familiar with "the way things are done", there should have > been a more assertive effort to remediate their submissions earlier in > the process. In this way, more people learn "the way things are done" > and more ideas are available to consider and, ultimately, a better > educated community is better for all of us.
I remember your previous comments and I re-state my opinion that the guidelines were published and mentioned more than enough on each and every plattform there is. But certainly re-stating does not mean improving. So, how do you propose to improve the process to achieve what you want? I am sure you don't want somebody watch all the incoming suggestions (470 for the logo) and reply to each one with a hint to the guidelines (not counting following discussions with the artist about those guidelines). I don't know if there is some feature in Flickr which replies with a customizable text to each upload. That's the only way I could think of. -- wobo
