On 20 May 2011 20:53, magnus <[email protected]> wrote: > With the last update in this evening (a lot of KDE stuff) laptop-mode-tools > were removed. > Is this ok? > An installation manually with bluez-pin wants to remove KDE!? > An installation with gnome-bluetooth (with gvfs-obexftp and > lib64gnome-bluetooth8) seems ok. > What's correct?
You should read the changelog of the afro-mentioned package :) $ urpmq --changelog pm-utils | head * Wed May 18 2011 ahmad <ahmad> 1.4.1-3.mga1 + Revision: 99676 - Conflict with laptop-mode-tools, its functionalities overlap pm-utils, and upstream thinks it should conflict http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612710#59 pm-utils upstream thinks that laptop-mode-tools isn't needed when pm-utils is installed; and that users shouldn't install both of pm-utils and laptop-mode-tools at the same time. For example we had this bug in Mageia: https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290 So, yes, the behaviour you see is the intended one, when installing pm-utils >= 1.4.1-3.mga1, urpmi will tell you it conflicts with laptop-mode-tools and asks to remove the latter. Since pm-utils is required by many core packages, it's going to be hard to install laptop-mode-tools. -- Ahmad Samir
