Wolfgang Bornath a écrit :
2011/6/7 Olav Vitters<[email protected]>:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:48:55AM +0200, Thomas Lottmann wrote:
On the other hand, I'd like to still have the possibility to keep
and install Gnome 2.xx in the future, as Gnome 3 isn't both stable
and reliable and complete yet.
GNOME 2.x is not needed, there is the fallback mode in GNOME3; it'll
give you a gnome-panel and so on. The default layout looks like
GNOME-shell, but it just is a newer gnome-panel.
The graphics is not such a big issue, as you stated, the user can
always use the fallback mode.
My personal killer of Gnome3 is the switch from normal editable
configuration files to a kind of registry, to be edited with a special
editor. This is a no-go. Normal text files for configuration is one of
the common basics of Linux (and most *nix based systems). Each rescue
system, be it as small as possible comes with a text editor (I've
never seen any system without vi) to edit configuration files and thus
mend a broken system. This will not be possible with Gnome3.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but this was what the Gnome people told me in Berlin.
No offense, but I hope you're wrong. I wouldn't like to see that either.
--
André
