bascule wrote: > On Wednesday 14 December 2011 21:36:41 David Walser wrote: >> The first set of messages you printed comes from msec. The second comes >> from sectool. Basically, you can ignore the messages from >> sectool. Unfortunately one of the updates to msec added sectool as a >> requires or suggests, but sectool is not well integrated with msec or >> Mageia. There are bugs about this in the bugzilla. The last comments on >> the bug were that dropping sectool is probably the best option, but this >> has not happened yet. > ah, i found the bugs you mentioned and i think i now understand the problem, > each of sectool and msec require a config file or such that fits the > goup/owner/perms scheme of the distro and the sectool one is wrong/from > another distro, yes? > > i'll do as you suggest and pay attention to the msec report and not the > sectool, > thankyou > > bascule
Yes, I believe sectool comes from Fedora.
