On Thursday, April 12, 2012 06:43:58 am Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 06:37:56 -0500 > > "Kevin R. Bulgrien" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thursday, April 12, 2012 04:51:05 am Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > > On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:18:18 +0200 > > > > > > Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Une erreur est survenue pendant l'installation des paquetages : > > > > > > > > le fichier /usr/include/openssl/cms.h de l'installation de > > > > lib64openssl-devel-1.0.0d-2.3.mga1.x86_64 entre en conflit avec le > > > > fichier du paquetage libopenssl-devel-1.0.0d-2.2.mga1.i586 > > > > > > > > le fichier /usr/include/openssl/cms.h de l'installation de > > > > libopenssl-devel-1.0.0d-2.3.mga1.i586 entre en conflit avec le > > > > fichier du paquetage lib64openssl-devel-1.0.0d-2.2.mga1.x86_64 > > > > > > I removed libopenssl-devel so that the upgrade goes fine. > > > Now I can't reinstall it: > > > https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5365 > > > > > > Damn. > > > > > > Antoine. > > > > What happens when you run: > > > > $ urpmq --whatprovides libopenssl-devel > > > > Are two different names displayed? If so, can you install by using the > > more detailed name? > > $ urpmq --whatprovides libopenssl-devel > lib64openssl-devel|lib64openssl-devel|lib64openssl-devel|lib64openssl-devel > > Which doesn't look right to me. > > Regards > > Antoine.
I should have had you do: $ urpmq -a --whatprovides libopenssl-devel Apparently the 32bit stuff doesn't show without the -a switch.
