I am not entirely sure I am that I am doing what you want but if I 
use -scale 480x480 the colours appear okay to me. I suspect that is 
what a browser is doing when it scales a image. 

"-scale uses a simpler, faster algorithm, and it ignores the -filter 
selection"

there is a perlmagick scale method too.

HTH.
Dp.


On 9 Jun 2006 at 10:19, Angela Slaney wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I'm using PerlMagick version 6.2.8 on my server.
> 
> I'm grabbing non-copyright wind-speed analysis images with a colour
> depth of 16. An example original image is here at
> http://activitae.com/images/wind.gif 
> 
> I need to reduce the image in physical size and, hopefully, byte size
> too to display on smartphones or PDAs.
> 
> When I grab an image and try to keep the colour depth the same I end
> up with an image with grubby brown colours whereas they were yellow,
> orange and red. Example http://activitae.com/images/wind1.gif 
> 
> 
> I've read the archive's previous posts about the file size of gif
> images ending up larger than they started because of artifacts added
> during resizing. And this certainly happens with these reduced colour
> depth images, although I have had good results using perlMagick to
> resize other web images. But these end up being 12Kb larger than the
> original despite being reduced to 71%.
> 
> The problem seems to be that Resize and Sharpen return the image to a
> 256 colour depth. And then a Quantize back to 16 seems to choose any
> colours in the image.
> 
> My question is this is there a way to restrict the Resize and Sharpen
> functions to only use the original image's colour table so I end up
> with an image with correct colours and of smaller file size?
> 
> And second question. If I handle an image request by passing back a
> web page with <img src="http://...."; height='483' width='483' > the
> browser then does the work of image reduction but appears to do it far
> better than PerlMagick does. Example is here
> http://activitae.com/NApda-2.htm . Is someone able to explain to me
> why?
> 
> All help appreciated.
> 
> Angela
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Magick-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://studio.imagemagick.org/mailman/listinfo/magick-users



_______________________________________________
Magick-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://studio.imagemagick.org/mailman/listinfo/magick-users

Reply via email to