> > If you guys want to make fun of the list members instead of helping > > them, can you please do it off-list? > > Sorry, don't get this remark. > > I was (more-or-less :-) flattering MS compared to what I > could have said, in > order to ensure my comments were on-topic by being directed > at OP's performance > concerns. > > More information on what to expect regarding future > (.NET-based) performance > issues can be read here: > > http://www.sysinternals.com/blog/2005/04/coming-net-world-im-s > cared.html > > Specifically note the part (under the images): 'the user > interface for SQL > Server 2005 beta 3 (written in managed code) consumes 80 MB > when run on a fresh > installation'. > > That's right, the menu system, no functionality, takes 80 Mb.
IM can take hundreds of megabytes of memory and serveral minutes of precious system time to process a simple BW image. Microsoft Paint can do this in seconds with very little memory usage (/wastage). So what's your point? I mean just cut the boloney and stick with useful advice please. Sincerely, Eric _______________________________________________ Magick-users mailing list [email protected] http://studio.imagemagick.org/mailman/listinfo/magick-users
