> Has any thought been given to having a Q1 version of ImageMagick?
None. Q1 support would require a complete rewrite of almost every algorithm in ImageMagick. We have been working toward supporting a floating point version which requires very few changes to the source. Some folks need floating point to support high dymanic range images. _______________________________________________ Magick-users mailing list [email protected] http://studio.imagemagick.org/mailman/listinfo/magick-users
