Grant,

I am sorry but there is no ONE way that is always best. IM does not 
yet have an autolevels function such as in Photoshop and even that 
has limitations. You will just have to try a some variations of 
-contrast-stretch percentages on a number of sample images until you 
find something that works more or less well for your range of images.

I would definitely upgrade to the latest IM version.  I don't recall 
what version you are on. But there have been many improvements and 
speed ups in the later versions.

If you were not using Perlmagick or some other API, I would recommend 
using one of my bash unix scripts, either redist or retinex. They are 
closer to a more consistent approach than even autolevels. But these 
scripts only run in command line IM, unless you are capable of 
re-writing them in Perlmagick. But I would still test in command line 
mode first on a number of your images until you find whether either 
script works well for you.

If you are interested in experimenting in command line mode with my 
scripts, you can get them at
http://www.fmwconcepts.com/imagemagick/index.html


Fred


>Thanks Fred.  I don't want to fine-tune for each image, so which
>technique do you think it most likely to work well for any image I run
>through it?  I can update imagemagick no problem.  Will I fare better
>with a newer version?
>
>- Grant
_______________________________________________
Magick-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://studio.imagemagick.org/mailman/listinfo/magick-users

Reply via email to