> | By merely placing two images side-by-side the colour changed! > | > | How come? > | > I tested your two test images using the latest version and the > color of 'A' does not change!
Good news! I have lots of images that need re-doing because of this problem. Can you identify `the latest version' binary for MS Windows? I am using 6.4.2 06/27/08 Q16 which is quite recent. > | Note that although this command specifies single-colour > | horizonatal slices, the result contains some `foreign' pixels > | within some slices?????. > | > This should have only happened because 'dither' was replacing colors, > when it should have been finding that the color present matched > the color pallette and should not need dithering. a) The convert command was itself creating the palette of < 256 colours, so dithering should not have been invoked. I now wonder if there is a way of specifying a palette for convert, eg from a palette file. Will have another look at the options. b) Given that `dither' implies incremental random changes about some mean, it seems strange that some horizontal slices seemed to include only a couple of `foreign' colours. BUT, maybe the entire slice WAS dithered and because the changes were small, I only noticed the `outliers'. Will have another look. _______________________________________________ Magick-users mailing list [email protected] http://studio.imagemagick.org/mailman/listinfo/magick-users
