> I *think* that thumbnail never loads the entire image into memory, Right. It most likely subsamples each scanline and therefore substantially reduces the memory requirement. We could do the same in ImageMagick like we already do for JPEG:
convert -size 600x800 image.jpg -thumbnail 600x800 thumbnail.jpg Its just something we have not implemented yet. _______________________________________________ Magick-users mailing list [email protected] http://studio.imagemagick.org/mailman/listinfo/magick-users
