On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Fred Weinhaus<[email protected]> wrote: > Using your second image and playing around, seems like you need to > control the saturation and not the brightness (or both). So the best > I got was about > > -modulate 95,220 > > Try that and play around. The second number is the saturation which > needed to be drastically increased to get close to what you had from > before. It also needed a bit decrease in brightness.
Thanks for the info. However, I now see that yellow may have been a bad choice for my sample files. I tried scanning a white page and when I used your suggested values for modulate I ended up with a blue page. This kind of makes me think that everything I scan may need a different value for modulate to make it look like I want. The nice thing about the previous behavior of the -modulate option was that I didn't have to tweak with it and it wasn't dependent on what color page I was scanning. I actually had a script that did all my scanning and there was a hardcoded value in it for -modulate and it just worked. I really don't want to have to experiment with every scan I do to find the best option for modulate. But from what you said in your previous email, there may not be a way to get back to the previous behavior. That's bad. I do a lot of scanning. -- Chris _______________________________________________ Magick-users mailing list [email protected] http://studio.imagemagick.org/mailman/listinfo/magick-users
