On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:37:28 -0400 John Culleton <[email protected]> wrote:
| On Monday 29 June 2009 12:00:30 am Anthony Thyssen wrote: | > On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:35:57 +0200 | > | > Noel da Costa <[email protected]> wrote: | > | Hi, | > | | > | Thanks... what I did was open it into Photoshop, which reports | > | the resolution as 300dpi. | > | Perhaps Gimp would do the same? | > | > BOTH would be faking it!!! | > Just as IM does. | > | > | > All of them are raster image processors. | | Therefore in Gimp one can increase or decrease the dpi figure and | run the dimensions up or down as you go. The converse is not true | for some reason. | What do you mean the converse is not true. Of course it is true. convert -density 300 file.ps info: convert -density 600 file.ps info: would report that the 600 dpi image is twice the size (four times the area) as the 300 dpi version! Anthony Thyssen ( System Programmer ) <[email protected]> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- UNIX is the spawn of the devil, why he even has his deamons running the thing! -- Anthony Thyssen ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Anthony's Home is his Castle http://www.cit.gu.edu.au/~anthony/ _______________________________________________ Magick-users mailing list [email protected] http://studio.imagemagick.org/mailman/listinfo/magick-users
