Cliff Pratt wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:02 AM, Torquil Macdonald > Sørensen<[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> Does anybody know if the command "convert 1.jpg 1.pdf" does a lossy >> transformation on the image data? I would like to create PDFs from JPGs >> without >> loosing any information. >> > PDFs can contain images, I believe, but that would just be wrapping > the JPG in a PDF. >
Yes, I was hoping for a way to do exactly that without influencing the image data. Latex is one possibility but I would prefer to not have to write the script myself :-) I want to do something like: $ jpg2pdf *.jpg doc.pdf for an arbitrary number of JPG files of course Maybe I will write a latex file that contains some fancy looping over all JPG files in the current directory, or a shell script that generates a taylored latex file and thereafter compiles it to PDF. - Torquil _______________________________________________ Magick-users mailing list [email protected] http://studio.imagemagick.org/mailman/listinfo/magick-users
