Thanks, settled by doing it in idl. No time to play, :( Brock
On Monday 18 April 2011 1:03 pm, Fred Weinhaus wrote: > Brock, > > I would suggest you repost this to the Discourse Server Users forum > (http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/), where the PNG > developer might have a better chance of seeing this and responding. > Also other IM users may have more knowledge about this situation. > PNG has been undergoing quite some changes (bug fixes and > enhancements over the last many releases. You could also post links > to your two images so others can test. Perhaps your version of IM > needs upgrading. I don't recall if you mentioned what version you are > using. > > Fred > > >The first creates a 64 bit palette (not 8 bit) but the image itself looked > >correct. > > > >convert secoora.west.qkm_sst.png secoora.east.qkm_sst.png +append -type > >palette test.png > >optics 220 :/optics1/virtual_ant/etc/cl> identify test.png > >test.png PNG 7480x7480 7480x7480+0+0 PseudoClass 65536c 3.8e+02kb 0.980u > > 0:02 > > > >The second, oddly, created a proper sized image, but scrunched the > > contents of both into 1/4 of the image on the x axis. So the top to > > bottom perspective was maintained, but the left to right was skewed with > > the whole appended image in the left 1/4 and right 3/4 of the image all > > in black. As you can see it is a 3 bit palette. > > > >convert secoora.west.qkm_sst.png secoora.east.qkm_sst.png +append > >PNG8:test2.png > >optics 224 :/optics1/virtual_ant/etc/cl> identify test2.png > >test2.png PNG 7480x7480 7480x7480+0+0 PseudoClass 3c 1.5e+02kb > > > >Thanks > > > >Brock > > _______________________________________________ > Magick-users mailing list > Magick-users@imagemagick.org > http://studio.imagemagick.org/mailman/listinfo/magick-users _______________________________________________ Magick-users mailing list Magick-users@imagemagick.org http://studio.imagemagick.org/mailman/listinfo/magick-users
