On 12 Mar 2010, at 15:26, Rémi Vanicat wrote: > Wouldn't be better to use bury-buffer ? Like that their is no risk of > destroying the buffer before git has ended its processing.
In the end, bury-buffer was indeed a better choice. Modified patch is attached. Philip: would you consider applying this please? -Steve To unsubscribe from this group, send email to magit+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
0001-Bind-q-to-bury-buffer-in-magit-process.patch
Description: Binary data
