At Wed, 4 Aug 2010 13:47:51 +0100, Steve Purcell wrote: > > On 4 Aug 2010, at 13:41, Philip Jackson wrote: > > > At Wed, 4 Aug 2010 04:33:31 -0700 (PDT), > > Suresh Kumar wrote: > >> > >> Never mind, I somehow missed the magit-process buffer. > > > > What was the failure? > >
The problem was on my side, the hunk was not applying cleanly. > >> IMO, magit should popup the magit-process buffer automatically if git > >> failed, something along the lines of magit-process-popup-time. > > > > Perhaps it could be optional but I like the current behaviour of > > failed (message) then '$' to see reason. > Never knew about '$', thanks, > > Or even, since $ isn't obvious to newcomers: > > failed (message) - press $ for more info > Yes, please. I see that '$' is being mentioned in [fn:1] and [fn:2]. I still somehow managed to miss it. [...] Thanks, Suresh Footnotes: [fn:1] http://philjackson.github.com/magit/magit.html#Introduction [fn:2] http://philjackson.github.com/magit/magit.html#The-branch-list
