When my branch relationships get complicated enough, I start naming them as parent.child1.child2. This is okay, but it would be great to have built-in support for this (maybe display a directed graph of the relationships between branches).
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Leo <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2010-12-27 10:09 +0000, Dave Abrahams wrote: > > One thing that Git tends to hide, which always bothers me, is the > > tracking relationship between branches and the associated remote. > > Seems to me the branch manager could easily have columns to display > > that information, and nice keybindings/commmands to change it. > > > > Thanks for listening, > > I am interested in knowing how others manage this issue too. I use > wazzup in magit, git log with --graph etc. and sometimes document it in > an org file. > > Leo > >
