On Friday, February 3, 2012, Moritz Bunkus <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey, > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 16:13, Eli Barzilay <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think that magit should leave the buffers as is > > I disagree. I like the current behavior and rely on the buffers being > up to date with the working tree after having checkout out a revision. > So if this is changed then it should be configurable (e.g. "revert > without asking", "revert with asking", "don't revert at all"). > > m.
This I can agree with. Make "asking" the default, and have a "never ask again" option, to keep all the convenience without the potential for surprising data loss. -- -PJ Gehm's Corrollary to Clark's Law: Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
