At 12:05 pm -0700 9/6/02, Ujwal Sathyam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >At 1:11 AM +0200 6/9/02, Vadim Zeitlin wrote: >>On Sat, 8 Jun 2002 09:01:45 +0100 ewitness - Ben Fowler >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>eBF> > interesting news! Which one? >>eBF> >>eBF> Classic MacOS. Mac OS 9. <URL: http://www.macnightowl.com/index.htm > >> >> I think that a Mac OS 9 port would be a rather difficult thing to do. This >>is why I'm personally mostly interested in Mac OS X one as it's much more >>realistic (well, in fact, it already works). AFAIK, the network layer is >>quite different in Mac OS 9 and so you'd have to do quite a bit of work on >>c-client and not only Mahogany... Of course, I might be totally wrong as I >>know nothing about Macs. And I'd surely be very glad if M ran under Mac OS >>9! > >Some time ago (a few years actually), I had attempted to port >Mahogany to MacOS (what we know as classic today). It is not trivial. >The biggest stumbling block was getting c-client to compile/run. >There was already a port of wxWindows/wxMac which worked pretty OK. >So I think if c-client can be ported, then a MacOS Classic port >should be do-able. One option of getting c-client and the networking >code to work may be to use the GUSI layer that provides a Unix-type >socket interface on the Mac. > >Ujwal
I agree that c_client is a sticking point. Do you have any hints? Ben. _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
