On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 14:57:55 +0200 Xavier Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
XN> My suggestion, on the contrary, would rather be to remove the option to
XN> change the Reply-prefix, and stick with the standard 'Re: '.
XN>
XN> I would even remove the option to generate 'Re[n]: '. After all, the
XN> threading code makes wonder, doesn't it? :)
Even if we do either this or that (and we probably won't), what will this
change for the messages from the other users? Let me answer my own
question: nothing because Outlook translates the "Re" string to the
national language and I have strong doubts that MS is going to change this
user-friendly feature just because it goes against the standard.
So, on the contrary, IMHO it would be nice to handle more reply prefixes
(i.e. for the common European languages)... Or maybe just treat any
^..?(\[\d+\]|\(\d+\)):
RE as the reply marker?
Regards,
VZ
-------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/
_______________________________________________
Mahogany-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
